single-instrument risk read · explains the math
NVDA
Technology · synthetic illustrative data
0
aggressive
risk score / 100
- Volatility (annualized)
- 42%
- Worst drawdown (sample)
- -35.5%
- Beta vs. market
- 1.75
- Sector
- Technology
Scored price path
the exact series the score is computed fromhover to scrub82.87 – 269.49
The read
NVDA looks aggressive on its own (risk score 80/100). Its estimated annualized volatility is 42%, its worst historical decline in the sample was -35.5%, and its beta of 1.75 means it tends to move more than the market.
A few things worth checking
- Does a beta of 1.75 fit how much market swing you can stomach?
- Would a decline like -35.5% be acceptable for your time horizon?
- Is NVDA sized appropriately for its 42% volatility?
Live market context
LIVE · TradingViewReal third-party market data, shown for context only. It is separate from the risk read above, which is computed on illustrative sample data.
Educational risk coaching, not financial advice. No buy/sell recommendations. Illustrative sample data.